January 13, 2023<\/p>\n
On January 12, 2023, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) sent a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), alleging that the two federal agencies are violating the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA).\u00a0 Among other things, the letter alleges that Reclamation is violating the ESA by continuing to operate the Deschutes River Basin Project, and that the Service is violating the ESA because it approved the Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and issued an incidental take permit under the ESA to the DBBC irrigation districts.\u00a0 At its core, CBD\u2019s allegation is that the Service and Reclamation are not doing enough to protect the Oregon spotted frog, a species that is listed as threatened under the ESA.\u00a0 The letter serves to notify the Service and Reclamation that CBD intends to sue them under the citizen suit provisions of the ESA.<\/p>\n
As required by the ESA, a party must provide 60 days\u2019 notice before it may bring a citizen suit.\u00a0 Thus, it appears the earliest that CBD will formally sue the agencies is March 14, 2023.\u00a0 We would note that CBD has not indicated in its letter that it intends to sue the irrigation districts, and as such, when CBD does file suit, the Service and Reclamation will be the defendants.\u00a0 Also, the letter does not allege that the districts are failing to implement the conservation measures included in the HCP or are otherwise failing to comply with the terms and conditions contained in the permit issued to them by the Service.\u00a0 Rather, CBD is asserting that the terms and conditions in the permit should be even more stringent than what\u2019s currently required.<\/p>\n
The new CBD notice of intent to sue follows prior litigation brought in 2015 by CBD and WaterWatch of Oregon (WaterWatch) against the Service, Reclamation, and five of the irrigation districts.\u00a0 In that litigation, CBD and WaterWatch moved for a preliminary injunction to significantly alter irrigation water storage and use in the basin.\u00a0 The U.S. District Court of Oregon denied that motion.\u00a0 The litigation ended in a settlement, pursuant to which the irrigation districts agreed to complete the HCP.\u00a0 The HCP was completed and approved by the Service at the end of 2020, and the irrigation districts have been implementing the HCP and honoring their commitments since that time.<\/p>\n
We will continue to monitor actions that may result from CBD\u2019s notice.\u00a0 In the meantime, the districts remain fully committed to following the terms and conditions contained in their incidental take permit issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 10 of the ESA.\u00a0 Moreover, we intend to take necessary and appropriate actions to ensure that our permit remains valid and continues to provide the districts with the certainty they need to store and deliver irrigation water to their patrons.<\/p>\n
The DBBC strongly believes that our communities should continue to work collaboratively and together from within rather than take direction from the outside, and we remain firmly committed to implementing the conservation measures outlined in the Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
January 13, 2023 On January 12, 2023, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) sent a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), alleging that the two federal agencies are violating the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA).\u00a0 Among other things, the letter alleges that Reclamation is violating<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n